๐Ÿš€ The Ultimate Guide to LLM Serving Frameworks for On-Premises Deployment
7 min read

๐Ÿš€ The Ultimate Guide to LLM Serving Frameworks for On-Premises Deployment

Alireza Mofidi
Alireza Mofidi

Data Scientist and ML Engineer

๐Ÿš€ On-Premises LLM Serving Frameworks: The TL;DR This guide compares the best frameworks for running LLMs on your own hardware. For maximum speed on GPUs, vLLM and TGI lead the pack with advanced batching techniques. If you're resource-constrained, LLaMA.cpp and Ollama provide lightweight solutions that even work on CPU. For complex enterprise deployments, Triton and Ray Serve offer robust multi-model management. Each framework balances different tradeoffs between ease of use, performance, and flexibility. Your choice should depend on your specific hardware resources, scale requirements, and deployment complexity tolerance.


๐Ÿš€ The Ultimate Guide to LLM Serving Frameworks for On-Premises Deployment

๐ŸŒŸ Introduction

Let's face it โ€“ running powerful LLMs on your own infrastructure is no small feat! As organizations increasingly bring AI capabilities in-house, finding the right serving framework becomes crucial for success. Whether you're concerned about data privacy, need lower latency, or just want complete control over your AI stack, on-prem deployment is often the way to go.

In this guide, we'll walk through both specialized LLM servers and general-purpose frameworks that can handle these language behemoths. I've spent countless hours testing these solutions so you don't have to! Let's dive into what makes each unique and how to choose the right one for your needs.

๐Ÿงฉ What Makes LLM Serving Different?

Before we jump into the frameworks, let's talk about why serving LLMs is such a special challenge:

  • ๐Ÿ’พย Massive memory requirementsย (those attention layers are hungry!)
  • ๐Ÿ”„ย Unique inference patternsย (token-by-token generation isn't your typical ML inference)
  • ๐Ÿ‘ฅย Multi-user juggling actย (handling concurrent requests efficiently)
  • โšกย Throughput vs. latency balancingย (the eternal tradeoff)

Now let's look at the star players in this space!

๐Ÿ”ฅ Specialized LLM Serving Frameworks

vLLM

In a nutshell:ย The speed demon of LLM serving, built for maximum GPU utilization

What I love about it:

  • ๐Ÿง  PagedAttention for insanely efficient memory management
  • ๐Ÿ”Œ Drop-in OpenAI API compatibility (your apps won't even know the difference!)
  • ๐Ÿš„ Blazing fast throughput that can handle serious traffic

Real talk:ย If you've got a GPU cluster and need raw speed, vLLM is tough to beat. One of my clients saw their throughput jump 15x after switching from a basic implementation! However, it's very focused on LLMs, so not your go-to for serving a variety of model types.

๐Ÿงฉ SGLang

In a nutshell:ย For when you need structured, controlled LLM interactions

The cool stuff:

  • ๐Ÿ“‹ Python-based DSL that makes complex prompt flows a breeze
  • ๐Ÿ”„ RadixAttention for clever KV cache reuse (translation: more efficient processing)
  • ๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ Works with both text and vision models (multimodal FTW!)

When to use it:ย If you're building complex agentic workflows or need fine-grained control over how your LLMs process and respond, SGLang shines. It's less about raw throughput and more about sophisticated interactions.

โšก DeepSpeed-FastGen

In a nutshell:ย Microsoft's enterprise-grade solution for serious deployments

Standout features:

  • ๐Ÿงฉ Dynamic SplitFuse for handling long prompts efficiently
  • ๐Ÿ”ข Awesome quantization support to squeeze more out of your hardware
  • ๐ŸŒ Scales beautifully across multiple GPUs when you need it

My take:ย This is the heavy artillery of LLM serving. Less approachable than some alternatives, but when you need to serve massive models at scale, it delivers where others struggle.

๐Ÿ’ป LLaMA.cpp Server

In a nutshell:ย The lightweight champion that runs surprisingly well on modest hardware

Why it's awesome:

  • ๐Ÿ”‹ Ridiculously efficient C/C++ implementation
  • ๐Ÿ’ช Runs respectably on CPU-only setups (yes, really!)
  • ๐Ÿชถ Minimal dependencies, easy to deploy anywhere

Perfect for:ย Developers who want to experiment locally or organizations with limited GPU resources. I've seen it running decent-sized models on standard laptops โ€“ amazing for prototyping!

๐Ÿ‘ Ollama

In a nutshell:ย The friendly, no-fuss way to run LLMs locally

What you'll love:

  • ๐ŸŒˆ Super simple CLI that "just works"
  • ๐Ÿงฐ Great for multiple models without complex setup
  • ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ Cross-platform support across macOS, Linux, and Windows

Real-world use:ย The go-to solution when you want to set up LLM infrastructure quickly without a PhD in systems engineering. I've gotten non-technical teams up and running with Ollama in under an hour!

๐Ÿ—๏ธ General-Purpose Model Serving Frameworks

NVIDIA Triton Inference Server

In a nutshell:ย NVIDIA's production-grade serving system for any deep learning model

The power features:

  • ๐ŸŽฏ Handles multiple models and frameworks simultaneously
  • ๐Ÿง  Smart scheduling of GPU resources for maximum utilization
  • ๐Ÿ“ฆ Enterprise-ready with robust monitoring and scaling options

My experience:ย Triton has a steeper learning curve than specialized frameworks, but the investment pays off when you need to serve diverse model types in production. Its dynamic batching is particularly impressive for throughput optimization.

๐Ÿ”ฅ TorchServe

In a nutshell:ย PyTorch's official serving solution, straightforward and reliable

What works well:

  • ๐Ÿงต Multi-worker architecture to scale single models
  • ๐Ÿ“‹ Simple model versioning and management
  • โšก Solid performance for PyTorch models without complexity

Best fit:ย Organizations heavily invested in the PyTorch ecosystem who want an officially supported solution. It's not the most feature-rich option, but it's reliable and well-maintained.

โ˜€๏ธ Ray Serve

In a nutshell:ย Flexible, scalable serving built on Ray's distributed computing framework

The cool parts:

  • ๐ŸŒ Native distribution across clusters
  • ๐Ÿ“Š DAG-based model pipelines for complex workflows
  • ๐Ÿ”„ Intelligent autoscaling that actually works

Why I recommend it:ย When you need to mix and match models in pipelines or scale dynamically, Ray Serve makes it surprisingly straightforward. It's particularly good at handling spiky traffic patterns.

๐Ÿฑ BentoML

In a nutshell:ย Developer-friendly packaging and serving for any ML model

What's special:

  • ๐Ÿ“ฆ "Bentos" concept for standardized model packaging
  • ๐Ÿ”„ Seamless integration with various ML frameworks
  • ๐Ÿš€ Simple path from local testing to production

In practice:ย BentoML excels at bridging the gap between data science experimentation and production serving. Its focus on developer experience makes the deployment process much smoother.

๐Ÿค— Hugging Face TGI (Text Generation Inference)

In a nutshell:ย Optimized specifically for transformer-based text generation

Star features:

  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Continuous batching for maximum throughput
  • ๐ŸŒŠ Efficient token streaming that feels responsive
  • ๐Ÿ”ง Advanced optimizations like Flash Attention built-in

The verdict:ย If you're serving popular open-source LLMs like Llama, Mistral, or Falcon, TGI gives you near-optimal performance with minimal tuning. The Hugging Face integration is seamless for teams already in that ecosystem.

๐Ÿ” Choosing Your Framework: The Decision Matrix

If you need...Consider these frameworks
Maximum throughput on GPUsvLLM, TGI, DeepSpeed-FastGen
Running on limited hardwareLLaMA.cpp, Ollama
Multi-model versatilityTriton, Ray Serve, BentoML
Enterprise-grade deploymentTriton, DeepSpeed, KServe (with ModelMesh)
Developer-friendly experienceOllama, BentoML, LitServe
Complex AI application workflowsSGLang, Ray Serve

๐Ÿ’ก My Personal Framework Selection Guide

After deploying dozens of LLM systems, here's my practical advice:

  1. Starting out?ย ๐Ÿ‘ถ Begin with Ollama or LLaMA.cpp to get familiar with LLM serving without complexity.

  2. Building a production app?ย ๐Ÿ’ผ vLLM offers the best balance of performance and ease of use for most LLM-specific deployments.

  3. Enterprise with diverse models?ย ๐Ÿข Triton or Ray Serve provide the flexibility and scalability needed for complex environments.

  4. Limited GPU resources?ย ๐Ÿ’ฐ LLaMA.cpp with quantization can make the most of what you have.

  5. Need sophisticated control flows?ย ๐Ÿง  SGLang's programming model is worth the learning curve.

๐ŸŽฏ Final Thoughts

The LLM serving landscape is evolving incredibly fast! What's cutting-edge today might be standard tomorrow. When making your choice, consider not just current needs but how your AI strategy might evolve.

Remember, the "best" framework depends entirely on your specific requirements. Often, the simplest solution that meets your needs is preferable to the most technically advanced option.

Have you tried any of these frameworks? I'd love to hear about your experiences! The on-premises LLM movement is growing stronger as organizations balance the convenience of cloud APIs with the control and cost-effectiveness of self-hosting.

Happy serving! ๐Ÿš€

๐Ÿ“š References

- NVIDIA. (2023). Triton Inference Server Documentation (https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/triton-inference-server/user-guide/docs/user_guide/model_execution.html)

- Ray. (2024). Ray Serve Documentation (https://docs.ray.io/en/latest/serve/index.html)

- Hugging Face. (2023). Text Generation Inference Documentation (https://huggingface.co/docs/text-generation-inference/en/index)

- vLLM Project. (2023). vLLM GitHub Repository (https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm)

- LMSYS Org. (2024). Achieving Faster Open-Source Llama3 Serving with SGLang(https://lmsys.org/blog/2024-07-24-sglang/)

- TitanML. (2024). Titan Takeoff Documentation (https://docs.titanml.co/)

- DeepSpeed. (2024). DeepSpeed-FastGen: High-throughput Text Generation for LLMs (https://www.deepspeed.ai/)

- BentoML. (2024). BentoML Documentation (https://docs.bentoml.org/)

- Ollama. (2024). Ollama GitHub Repository (https://github.com/ollama/ollama)